A storm brews in the crypto gaming world as Revolving Games’ CEO faces serious allegations. An investor claims Ammar Zaeem, co-CEO of Revolving Games, broke a promise to refund a $100,000 investment tied to NFTs. The controversy, which has erupted on social media, has sparked heated debates.
Revolving Games CEO Face Off With Investor
Ammar Zaeem, the co-CEO of Revolving Games, is currently facing serious accusations for allegedly failing to honor a previously agreed-upon refund agreement. The allegations originate from an X user known as Luckytradess, who is an angel investor claiming a substantial financial loss of $100,000 linked to this investment. The funds were invested in USDC for RCADE tokens; however, there was no formal contract to solidify the terms of this transaction.
Luckytradess asserts that during discussions, Zaeem had assured him he would cover any losses associated with NFT investments should they occur. Unfortunately, according to Luckytradess, Zaeem later retracted this promise, leaving him with significant financial uncertainty. These events can be traced back to an investment made in 2024.
The Need for a Formal Agreement
No formal agreement resolving the dispute has been publicly confirmed as of the time of writing. Zaeem has reportedly denied that the refund falls within his business obligations, while Luckytradess continues to press claims, seeking accountability through social media pressure.
Both parties appear locked in a stalemate, with no legal contract to enforce. Discussions for a potential settlement remain speculative, pending further developments.
Revolving Games has not issued an official statement addressing the allegations. Zaeem’s stance suggests that he views the issue as a misunderstanding, rather than fraud. Luckytradess, however, demands transparency and compensation for the investment loss. The absence of a written agreement complicates resolution, leaving negotiations uncertain.
Meanwhile, blockchain investments have not all been successful; recent cases of business dealings that have turned sour have only highlighted the inherent risks. For instance, over 500 Chinese creditors challenged FTX’s decision yesterday to freeze a $470 million payout, which is crucial for their financial survival.
The move stems from FTX’s 2022 collapse, which left billions in customer funds frozen, including Chinese creditors who hold 82% of the $470 million in claims. Led by figures like creditor Will, they hired U.S. attorneys to represent them in their case. Dozens of users have sent formal objections to the bankruptcy court, demanding FTX release the funds.
Find Cryptocurrencies to Watch and Read Crypto News on the Go Follow CryptosToWatch on X (Twitter) Now
